QUANTITATIVE
METHODS
|
General:
Overall performance of the candidates was quite
satisfactory. Most of the questions were successfully attempted
by a large number of the candidates. Major reason for failure is
the lack of understanding of the concepts. More emphasis should
be laid on this aspect of the subject in teaching.
Question-wise comments are as under:
|
|
Q.1 |
In part (a) the first step was to form a relationship
between the interest earned on stocks yielding 4%, 5% and 8%. This
could have been done either by using a single variable or by using
three variables. Majority of the students failed to apply simple
logic to determine the above. However, many students did manage
to secure full marks.
In part (b) of the question, quite a large number
of the candidates were unable to take the first step of taking 1/3x
as equal to (3)-x before taking the log on both sides.
Some of them did not know that log of 1 is zero; others unnecessarily
made things complicated by breaking down 12 into 2 x 2 x 3. However,
quite a large number of the candidates successfully solved this
part.
|
|
|
|
|
Q.2 |
Part (a) was quite simple i.e. finding the thirteenth
term of the Arithmetic Progression (AP). Most of the candidates
got full marks for this part. However, some of the candidates calculated
total number of seats, instead of finding the number of seats in
the 13th row. It showed that the candidates wrote the
formulas and applied them without knowing whether or not these are
appropriate. Part (b) of the question was not properly tackled by
a considerable number of the candidates. Some of them did not know
the meaning of simple discount, others were unable to convert nine
months into year(s). |
| |
|
|
Q.3 |
In part (a) of the question, the candidates were
first required to determine the amount left after two years’ loss.
Majority of them failed to calculate this amount. Perhaps they are
familiar with the determination of the future amount with profit
but not with loss. However, a large number of the candidates adopted
the correct procedure for the second part, they were awarded marks
for this part if it was correctly done. |
| |
|
|
|
Part (b) of the question was a straightforward
question of determining the present value of equal quarterly payments.
Majority of the candidates did obtain full marks for this part of
the question. However, some of them used the formula for finding
the future value of an annuity and got it all wrong. |
| |
|
|
|
Q.4 |
(a) |
Most of the candidates were able to demonstrate
their understanding on Differentiation of functions. Majority of
the students attempted it correctly whether they used the chain
rule method or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Again almost all the students attempted this question
but a few got confused with the differentiation of quotient.
|
| |
|
|
Q.5 |
The marginal cost estimation through differentiation
of cost function was done by almost all the students and many of
them did it correctly. But it was felt that the concept was not
very much clear to all the candidates which was evident from the
fact that only a few were able to calculate the actual marginal
cost and worked out the difference with the estimated one. The concept
of average cost function was however, clear to most of the students. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Q.6 |
Part (a) of the question was very simple, if the
candidates knew that for two equal matrices, corresponding elements
of both are equal. Majority of the students gave correct answers.
In part (b), majority of the candidates correctly
computed the values of PQ, QC and PQC but only a small number of
them gave correct interpretations for these values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.7 |
In this question, the candidates were required
to calculate a weighted price index using Laspeyre’s formula and
index of value. They were also required to interpret their results.
Majority of the candidates computed the price index but only few
could correctly calculate the value index. Only a small number of
the candidates gave the interpretation of their results. This clearly
shows that the candidates are not aware of the meaning of these
indices and therefore it would be difficult for them to apply these
indices in the real world situations/settings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.8 |
Majority of the candidates were successful in arriving
at the correct value of ‘r’, the linear correlation co-efficient.
Some students assigned a positive sign to ‘r’ which was incorrect.
A positive value of r meant that with the increasing age of the
cars, their prices, on the average, would also increase which is
against common sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the basic principle about r is that its
value ranges between –1 and 1, yet a number of candidates obtained
answers much beyond these limits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
The major mistake which most of the candidates
made was that they added the 8C2 , 6C2 and
10C2 values instead of multiplying them.
|
|
|
|
Q.9 |
(a) |
Almost half of the students were able to attempt
this question of probability correctly. Some got confused with the
application of correct formula while others were not quite clear
of the concept. Some students were not clear about the terms “Exactly
one” and “At least one” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Majority of the candidates calculated mean and
standard deviation correctly, however only about half of them were
able to do the questions on probability correctly. A common mistake
which many students made was that they calculated the probability
of x £ 4 instead of x <
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Quite a good number of students did apply the hypergeometric
distribution for calculating the probability and got the correct
answer. |
| |
|
|
Q.10 |
In part (a) of this question, the candidates were
required to state the formula of standard error for infinite population
and then substituting values of 60 and 240, (240 being 4 times of
60) to conclude that the standard error will be halved. This simple
point that if sample size is increased four fold, standard error
will only be reduced to one half was missed by a very large number
of the candidates. Majority of the candidates only mentioned that
standard error would be reduced but only a few of them indicated
to what extent.
In part (b) of the question, candidates were required
to answer four queries, all relating to hypothesis testing. The
first three were answered correctly by a significant number of the
candidates but part (iv) was rarely attempted.
Namely P-value for right tailed test = Pr(z>2)
= 0.5 minus area for z=2. In the first three parts, the candidates
generally committed the following mistakes. |
| |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Alternative hypothesis was not correctly stated
: it was one tailed test but was treated as two-tailed test. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Correct Z value could not be ascertained. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Reason for using Z distribution i.e. n >30, was not given by most of the students.
. Some of the candidates stated the reason that since s is given they would use Z distribution but
this was not correct as sample standard deviation (s) was given
and not the population standard deviation (s). |
|
|
|
|
|
Q.11 |
Only a small number of the candidates attempted
this question, and only a few of those who attempted gave the correct
solution. Some of the candidates did not know that the question
relates to proportions/percentages. They treated it as the question
of difference of means. |
|
|
|
|
|